“American companies are quietly scaling back in Hong Kong amid growing safety concerns, with many fearing potential arrests for routine business activities,” he said. Singleton said action by the private sector might be more meaningful. They also urged Congress to pass the stalled legislation. The committee and 23 other Hong Kong advocacy groups issued a joint statement on Thursday calling the Biden administration’s response “inadequate and concerning.” They urged the government to sanction Hong Kong officials responsible for the intensifying crackdown and offer haven in the U.S. is needed to facilitate future behavioral changes among (Chinese) and Hong Kong officials. “The latest response by the Biden administration has honestly concerned me about the administration’s commitment to stand up against Beijing’s aggression,” said Frances Hui, policy and advocacy coordinator for the Washington-based Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation.

of their diplomatic privileges has not moved forward and neither has one that would require the president to consider sanctioning the city’s judges, prosecutors and police commissioner if they were found to have undermined civil freedoms there. In Congress, a bill to strip Hong Kong’s trade offices in the U.S. needs to respect China’s sovereignty and the rule of law in Hong Kong, and should not disrupt, still less interfere, in the process,” said ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin. Xi told Biden the law reflected a “constitutional responsibility to safeguard national security,” which he said would protect the well-being of Hong Kong’s people and the interests of global investors, according to China’s foreign ministry. Hong Kong and the latest legislation was brought up during the phone call between President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping on April 2. “Moreover, it’s not entirely clear that any specific actions from Washington would prompt Beijing to meaningfully reassess its approach towards Hong Kong, with Chinese policymakers having more or less signaled that Hong Kong’s fate is not up for debate.” policymakers appear resigned to the fact that China’s takeover of Hong Kong is, for all intents and purposes, complete and irreversible,” said Craig Singleton, senior China fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a research institute based in Washington. measures would be unlikely to bring about meaningful change.

The State Department declined to preview or comment on any potential actions but said it is considering all options.Īnalysts suggest the Biden administration may not want to rock relations with China in an election year, especially when the impact of the law might take a while to manifest itself and any punitive U.S. While the new law, known as Article 23, now expands the Hong Kong government’s powers to go after those it accuses of spying and to target dissidents anywhere in the world, Washington has been treading carefully. responded by hitting the city’s highest-ranking officials with sanctions and depriving the territory of its preferential trading status. That’s a far cry from 2020, when Beijing imposed national security restrictions to end months of unrest on Hong Kong streets. has announced visa restrictions on an unspecified number of unnamed Hong Kong officials but taken no further action. Since the law’s swift passage on March 19, the U.S. has denounced Hong Kong’s new national security law as a tool to potentially silence dissent both at home and abroad, but so far the action from Washington has been notably muted, disappointing those fighting for the Chinese territory’s democracy and freedoms.

Nytimes live election updates